Can Brazil pull off a win on the pitch and in markets?

Few things define Brazil as clearly as soccer. In this year’s World Cup, A Seleção (as the Brazilian squad is known) is set to showcase its familiar jogo bonito, or beautiful game. As a perennial emerging market, however, the country’s economic outlook is less predictable. As any Brazilian will tell you, a partida é uma caixinha de surpresas—the match is full of surprises.

Brazil’s macroeconomic fundamentals include real strengths: a large and diversified economy, strong external buffers and deep natural-resource endowments. But chronic political tensions, governance frictions, periodic corruption scandals and rising fiscal concerns remain constraints. Understanding Brazil at this juncture is key to assessing where risks and opportunities lie.

Brazil’s economic scorecard: Growth cools as momentum fades

Brazil’s performance resembles a soccer match drifting into injury time. Results have exceeded expectations in recent years—with gross domestic product (GDP) growth outpacing expectations, unemployment at a record low and inflation modest by Brazilian standards—but momentum is fading. The stands are louder, the weather is turning and small mistakes can quickly change the scoreline.

On the macroeconomic side, consumers have helped control the tempo, supporting solid demand. Commodities can always be counted on to put the ball in the net, with agriculture playing the role of star striker. But the broader team has been uneven and shot conversion is slowing as fatigue sets in.

Growth is expected to moderate to around 2% this year and next—an underwhelming score for a team of Brazil’s calibre. Rate cuts should add liquidity and support traction, but the easing cycle will be shallow as authorities weigh election uncertainty, fiscal concerns and inflation pressures linked to the conflict in the Middle East.

Climate shocks and global trade crosswinds test Brazil’s outlook

Brazil’s booming agriculture sector has strong long-term prospects, but volatile climate patterns remain a persistent risk. Demand fundamentals have improved after years of reform, yet geopolitical shocks can still undercut near-term macro-fiscal plans.

As an energy producer, Brazil benefits from higher crude prices, which improve terms of trade and boost government revenues. However, rising fertilizer costs could hit agricultural producers, while higher global gas prices risk squeezing household purchasing power.

A decisive question heading into 2026 is traction—whether households and firms can keep their footing on a pitch increasingly muddied by external shocks. Brazil has shown an ability to make the most of a difficult global backdrop. A pragmatic foreign-policy posture has helped it stay balanced amid the United States-China rivalry, while trade diversification has cushioned shifts in U.S. tariff policy. Provisional implementation of the EU–Mercosur trade agreement should bring benefits and could also revive optimism around a Canada-Mercosur deal late this year.

Political noise and fiscal constraints raise late-cycle risks

Off the pitch, political tensions are running high. With President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (“Lula”) seeking re-election, Brazil is entering a volatile phase. Institutional resilience limits rupture risk, but weakening governability and a compressed legislative calendar reduce the scope for much-needed structural reform.

Fiscal pressures remain a tough opponent. Social assistance programs, public-sector pension liabilities and tax inefficiencies leave limited room to manoeuvre. An elevated deficit, driven largely by interest payments, has put public debt on unstable footing. The Banco Central do Brasil has kept real interest rates among the world’s highest, preventing capital outflows, but crowding out private investment and weighing on productivity. Brazil invests just 17% of GDP, roughly half the rate of India.

The standoff between fiscal and monetary policy will likely persist until after the election. The outcome will shape how this stalemate is resolved. The next legislature is expected to remain right-of-centre and highly fragmented, while the presidential race is shaping up as a tight contest between President Lula and Flávio Bolsonaro, the son of his former rival.

A Lula re-election would point to broad policy continuity and an active state role in credit and industrial policy. A Bolsonaro victory would likely signal a more orthodox fiscal stance and a renewed push for deregulation, potentially with less legislative friction. Either outcome adds to Brazil’s familiar ruído político—noise that can widen spreads, swing the currency and weigh on investment. Canadian exporters and investors should treat 2026 as a volatility year and be ready to move once the policy path becomes clearer.

The bottom line: Playing the final minutes

Brazil’s current scoresheet carries clear implications for Canadian firms. It remains a large, diversified market where technical expertise and patient capital can compound—especially when paired with Canada’s strengths in environmental, social and governance (ESG). The country also offers meaningful diversification potential at a time of heightened global risk.

The challenge is finishing the match without unnecessary fouls. Opportunities remain for Canadian companies that play to Brazil’s strengths and target niche gaps. Export Development Canada’s (EDC) established presence, deep market expertise and broad suite of financial and knowledge solutions can help exporters and investors tap Brazil’s long-term potential.

This week, special thanks to Daniel Benatuil, senior country risk analyst for Latin America.

As always, at EDC Economics, we value your feedback. If you have ideas for topics that you’d like us to explore, please email us at economics@edc.ca and we’ll do our best to cover them.